How Harris’s Economic Strategy Could Help Farmers

Taking on monopolies and lowering consumer costs is both a winning political strategy and the right thing to do

Emma Nicolas, Jessica Cusworth & Christian Lovell, Farm Action Fund August 26, 2024

This story was produced and originally published by Farm Action Fund, which is dedicated to building the political muscle to stop corporate monopolies, hold government accountable, and build fair competition in rural America.

There’s been a flurry of headlines since presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harris announced on August 16 that, if elected, she plans to take on major corporations to lower the price of groceries. With a proposed price gouging ban, Harris’s agenda targets the largest, most powerful billion-dollar companies that have been caught using supply chain disruptions to inflate costs for American consumers in recent years.

Her plan is already rattling the corporations that control our food system. Misinformation regarding how she intends to curtail grocery costs is circulating in the news and on social media—with some making claims that her plan includes price controls. USA Today’s Ingrid Jacques writes, “Harris’ new light-on-facts blueprint for the economy … plays right into the socialist stereotype.” Washington Post’s Catherine Rampell, writes, “It’s hard to exaggerate how bad this policy is,” explaining that Harris’s proposal is similar to Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s (D-Mass.) Price Gouging Prevention Act of 2024. However, based on the details released, Harris’s plan lacks any mention of using price controls and functions similar to state price gouging laws already in place. 

Addressing corporate greed is critical to repairing our consolidated food system. From our perspective at Farm Action Fund, a nonpartisan organization at the forefront of this movement, we can explain why.

A crackdown on corporate control

To see where Harris is heading, it’s worth noting how President Joe Biden shaped this path forward. Taking an approach not seen since the Roosevelt era, Biden has taken massive swings at monopolies, including filing a series of antitrust lawsuits against major companies. Though his work went largely unacknowledged or unknown, the Biden administration’s antitrust actions have impacted multiple industries, including food and agriculture. 

U.S. Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan, center, addresses Iowa and National Farmers Union presidents, Iowa state Democratic Reps. and more than 100 farmers during a listening session by groups opposed to the $3.6 billion sale of an Iowa fertilizer plant to Koch Industries. The sale of the plant, which was constructed using nearly $550 million in local, state and federal tax incentives, has spurred antitrust concerns.

Biden’s momentous trustbusting work in the food and agriculture sector started with his July 2021 Executive Order on Competition aimed at breaking up monopolies, which led to the following: 

  • New merger guidelines: At the end of 2023, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), under the leadership of Chair Lina M. Kahn, and the Department of Justice (DOJ) issued new merger guidelines, which strengthened enforcement against mergers that would significantly impact competition or lead to a monopoly. 
  • “Product of U.S.A.” reform: This U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) rule mandated that the “Product of U.S.A.” label can only be used on products “derived from animals born, raised, slaughtered, and processed in the U.S.”
  • Packers and Stockyards Act (P&S Act) rulemakings: The USDA is strengthening the P&S Act of 1921 with a series of rules to level the playing field for farmers and ranchers.
  • Lawsuits against Agri Stats and Cargill-Continental: The DOJ brought litigation against two major companies in the food and agriculture system for their antitrust violations.
  • Noncompetes banned: The FTC issued a rule prohibiting the abusive practice of including noncompete clauses in worker contracts, which prevented workers from freely switching jobs.

These actions by the Biden administration have charted a course toward loosening corporations’ stranglehold on our food system. Harris’s initial plans indicate she would largely build on Biden’s work and take it further in some cases.

How Harris plans to take on corporate greed

During her North Carolina campaign event on August 16, Harris presented the first look at her campaign’s economic policy. Her agenda includes policies like blocking unfair mergers and a first-ever federal ban on price gouging.

As Matt Stoller explains, Harris’s price gouging ban is currently open-ended and mentions nothing about price controls—though some have jumped to that conclusion. Harris’s proposed ban emulates a bill Farm Action Fund helped Senator Elizabeth Warren craft earlier this year. The bill seeks to codify at the federal level a law that at least 37 states already have some variation of on the books

Just this year, the FTC found that large corporations took advantage of supply chain disruptions at the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic to raise consumer prices and increase their profit margins. Corporations have made it increasingly difficult for Americans to feed their families during market disruptions, and Harris’s proposed ban seeks to stop that. 

Keep an Independent Mind

Sign up to receive twice-weekly Barn Raiser updates on original, independent reporting from rural and small town America.

mail

Harris’s campaign said she plans to ban price gouging in part by expanding the FTC’s reach, enabling them to impose “harsh penalties” on firms that break price gouging limits—similar to Warren’s bill and even some state laws. 

Harris’s plans to tackle corporate consolidation—especially in the meat packing industry—also appear promising as Biden’s top economic adviser, Brian Deese, the former director of Biden’s National Economic Council, has been tapped for Harris’s campaign. Deese was one of the advisers responsible for drafting actions to address the high concentration in the meatpacking industry, arguing that it has led to inflated consumer costsHarris echoed that argument on August 16, indicating that she intends to crack down on major meat companies for price gouging while continuing to level the playing field for small meat packers through a Biden-Harris financial investment initiative. 

Additionally, on Sunday, the Democratic National Convention approved an agenda that includes two more Farm Action Fund priorities. The agenda calls for adoption of legislation that grants farmers the right to repair their own machinery, a right that dominant equipment manufacturers like John Deere have long restricted. The agenda also indicates that the party will seek to limit foreign ownership of U.S. farmland in an effort to protect our nation’s food supply and national security. 

Harris has laid the initial groundwork for an economy that shifts power away from corporations and back into the hands of farmers and consumers—a fight we have been at for years.

In May, Farm Action’s Joe Maxwell testified before a Senate committee, demonstrating the impact that price gouging has on both consumers and farmers.

“Due to today’s heavily concentrated and vertically integrated food and agriculture supply chains, dominant firms no longer need to compete with each other in order to be profitable,” Maxwell said in his testimony. “Their market power leaves farmers and consumers vulnerable to market abuses: These companies use opportunistic market behavior to set the price they pay farmers and the price they charge consumers with little regard for market dynamics.”

How Harris can go further to support farmers

Farm Action Fund applauds Harris’s plans while urging her to consider further policies to support farmers and ranchers—policies that will level the playing field and rebuild America’s food system. These include:

  • Continue the Biden administration’s work of strengthening the P&S Act to protect farmers and ranchers from unfair practices by large corporations. 
  • Reform the USDA’s checkoff programs to restore them to their original purpose: a collective tool for product research and promotion. Prevent the USDA from awarding these farmer-funded tax dollars to industry lobbying organizations.
  • Enforce truth in labeling to stop corporations from greenwashing their products and exploiting markets developed by independent farmers. 
  • Improve farmers’ access to risk management tools, credit and land. 
  • Invest in smaller meatpacking plants to provide farmers and ranchers additional options for where to take their animals for slaughter. 
  • Implement values-aligned government food purchasing by prioritizing local and regional producers. 
  • Stop foreign, corporate and billionaire investors from snapping up farmland and increasing land prices. 
  • Push Congress to enact legislation that grants farmers the right to repair their own machinery, a right that dominant equipment manufacturers like John Deere have restricted.

The next president must continue the work of the Biden administration in challenging corporate consolidation and leveling the playing field for America’s farmers. This is the only path to building a fair and competitive food system that stops corporate price gouging and protects national and food security. 

Farm Action Fund is a nonpartisan organization, and our analyses are based on elected officials’ adherence to the principles of our mission: to stop corporate monopolies, hold government accountable and build fair competition in rural America.

Emma Nicolas

Emma Nicolas, as Communications Coordinator at Farm Action Fund,  works to raise awareness and build community around the shared goal of reforming the food and agriculture system.  She holds a Bachelor of Journalism from the University of Missouri. She spent over five years in the journalism field and the last few years working on an organic vegetable farm in Michigan.

Jessica Cusworth

As Communications Manager, Jessica focuses on furthering engagement with Farm Action Fund's work to create a fair and sustainable food and agriculture system. Jessica holds a B.A. in Global Environmental Studies and an M.S. in Environmental Science and Policy from Clark University. She brings a wide range of experience from her past work in land conservation, where she focused on wildlife habitat restoration, environmental monitoring, volunteer management, and engaging communities in land stewardship.

Christian Lovell

Christian Lovell draws on his deep experience in production agriculture and food policy as Farm Action’s Senior Director of Programs. In this role, he provides leadership and direction for the organization’s growing program portfolio to advance a more just food system. Previously, Christian spent nearly a decade working on federal agricultural policy in Washington, DC, and served as Legislative Director to U.S. Representative Rosa DeLauro during her time as Chair of the House Committee on Appropriations. He also held other roles at the National Governors Association, The World Bank, and Informa Economics Group.

Have thoughts or reactions to this or any other piece that you’d like to share? Send us a note with the Letter to the Editor form.

Want to republish this story? Check out our guide.

8